How we rank
Eight criteria, weighted for high-roller play. Same formula every operator, every review.
Eight criteria, weighted for high-roller play. Same formula every operator, every review.
Our scoring is built for the bet size and play patterns of high-stakes casino customers, not for grinders chasing wagering requirements. That bias is reflected in the weights:
| Criterion | Weight |
|---|---|
| Vip Programme | 25% |
| Withdrawal Speed | 20% |
| Game Variety | 15% |
| Live Dealer | 15% |
| Payments | 10% |
| Bonus | 5% |
| Mobile | 5% |
| Support | 5% |
VIP programme and withdrawal speed together account for 45% of the score. Bonus and mobile are 5% each because for the customer we have in mind they are nice-to-haves, not deal-breakers.
A high-roller customer cares about three things in this order:
We do not score on logo design, app aesthetics, or "user experience" beyond functional points like deposit time and withdrawal flow. Those things matter to product teams. They do not move the needle on whether a customer wins or loses or gets paid.
Every review is based on a hands-on test of the operator: account creation, deposit, at least one withdrawal cycle, customer support contact, and at least an hour of live-dealer play. The test log on each review page records exactly what we did and when.
We do not test at every operator at their maximum stake. Withdrawal-speed scores for the highest tier are derived from operator-published limits and player-reported data from public forums and Reddit threads, not from us individually wiring 50,000 GBP through every brand.